SIGRUN ANKE MERRILL, APPELLANT,

v.

ROBERT EDWARD MERRILL, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Pomerantz v. State, 372 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …lice such as to make him their agent, the evidence produced may be excluded as in derogation of the constitutional mandate against unreasonable searches and seizures by governmental action.” Annot., 36 A.L. R.3d 553, 559 (1971). See State v. Gibson, 362 So. 2d 41, 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). In the instant case, we have no problem in determining that Detective Johnson and Magdalena actively participated in the search of the defendant’s suitcases. When the officers arrived in the baggage area, they observed two b…
• State v. Egar Gonzalez, 467 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …ed because there is no showing that the seized medical records contain a confession by the defendant, a necessary precondition to a successful assertion of the Florida privilege against self-incrimination in these circumstances. See State v. Gibson, 362 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 368 So. 2d 1367 (Fla. 1979); Hampton v. State, 308 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 317 So. 2d 78 (Fla.1975); Kircheis v. State, 269 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).…
• Pritchett v. State, 414 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …dence against the defendant should not have been admitted, but see Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966); State v. Sobel, 363 So. 2d 324 (Fla.1978); Freimuth v. State, 272 So. 2d 473 (Fla.1972); State v. Gibson, 362 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), the admission of such evidence was harmless and did not unduly prejudice the defendant’s right to a fair trial. Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

• Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1976)
• Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co. & William A. Cagle, 349 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 1977)
• Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 1977)
• Oaklander v. Jules Oaklander, 351 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
• Burch v. Burch, 352 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)