HARVEY THOMAS ANDERSON, PETITIONER,

v.

FIRST STATE BANK OF LANTANA, FIRST AMERICAN BANK OF LAKE WORTH, N.A., AND CENTRAL BANK OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• McKEE v. State, 450 So. 2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …406 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971).1 Since the defendant not only failed to object to the instructions, but also expressed his agreement to its submission, we find that he is estopped to complain now that the jury has followed the instruction. Perry v. State, 362 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) (where defendant not only failed to object to defective verdict form at trial, but also agreed to its submission, any error was invited). As was most aptly stated by Judge Schwartz in McCray v. State, 397 So. 2d 1229, 1231, n. 4…
• Heriberto Delvalle v. State, 653 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
  …ct forms by timely objection at trial. In fact, defense counsel specifically expressed satisfaction with the verdict forms on two separate occasions prior to their submission to the jury. The error, therefore, was an invited one. See Perry v. State, 362 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Given the evidence adduced at trial, the error also was harmless, since it is inconceivable that any rational jury could have returned a verdict finding that there was no firearm involved in the commission of the charged offense…
• Brod v. Ira L. Adler, 570 So. 2d 1312 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …waiver of defects).1 What the jury intended was very clear from the verdict forms given them by the parties with the court’s approval. Any error in the verdict was thus invited. Schaffer v. Pulido, 492 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Perry v. State, 362 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978) (where defendant failed to object to verdict form which was contrary to law, error was invited and defendant is not entitled to post-verdict relief). Further, if the jury had been instructed that, as a matter of law, it could not…