JOSE EMILIO REIGOSA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1978-09-26
No. 77-2655
Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and BARKDULL and KEHOE, JJ.
362 So. 2d 714 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1978)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the state failed to prove the appellant was dangerous to himself or others, which is required for involuntary hospitalization under the Baker Act.


Facts & Procedural History

The state petitioned for involuntary hospitalization of the appellant under the Baker Act, alleging mental illness. The record showed the appellant wa…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
KEHOE, Judge.

KEHOE, Judge.

This is an appeal of an order of involuntary hospitalization under the Baker Act, specifically Section 394.467, Florida Statutes . We reverse.

A careful review of the record of the hearing on the state’s petition for involuntary hospitalization reveals that although it was adequately proven that appellant was mentally ill, he was not shown to be dangerous to himself. Neither did the state show by clear and convincing evidence that he was dangerous to others, physically or emotionally, or without the capacity to survive in freedom with the help of family or friends. Indeed, the record is barren of any exploration of less restrictive alternatives to involuntary hospitalization.

Absent clear and convincing proof that an individual is dangerous to himself or others, the state may not deprive him of his freedom on the basis of mental illness alone if he is capable of surviving with help in freedom. O’Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563, 95 S.Ct. 2486, 45 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975); In re Beverly, 342 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1977); In re Smith, 342 So. 2d 491 (Fla.1977).

The order of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded with instructions to consider the possibilities of other means of treating appellant than by involuntary hospitalization, and to explore all possible alternatives to this draconian procedure.

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw