FORENTHA JUDGE, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2007-11-30
No. 5D06-4115
GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
971 So. 2d 897 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2007) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Forentha Judge, pro se, appeals an order of the Department of Children and Families [“DCF”] denying her objection to the date of reinstatement of cash assistance benefits. Benefits were suspended based on the truancy of her dependent children. The record supports DCF’s suspension of benefits and the date of reinstatement.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, THOMPSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Sebastian v. THE City of Miami (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
  • Manrique v. Universal Fin. OF Miami, Inc., 11 So. 3d 456 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
    …State Court for further proceedings for enforcement hereof consistent with this order.” Relitigation of the matters determined in the United States Bankruptcy Court is not permitted. See E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., Inc. v. Melvin Piedmont Nursery, 971 So. 2d 897 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). The [*457] defendant-appellee has not carried the burden of demonstrating any reversible error. Affirmed.…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw