PHILIP GEORGE BAGLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
DAVID BRIERTON, SUPERINTENDENT FLORIDA STATE PRISON, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that allegations regarding disciplinary proceedings, if true, warrant a hearing, while allegations regarding medical care were insufficient to establish entitlement to relief.
Appellant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging inadequate medical care and due process violations in disciplinary proceedings. The t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Procedural Requirements cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus based on several grounds. The trial court denied the petition without a hearing. The two grounds brought to this court on appeal are that appellant was deprived of adequate medical care and of due process of law in disciplinary proceedings.
We do not believe that the allegations regarding the adequacy of medical care establish conclusively that, if true, appellant is entitled to relief. The denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus on that ground is, therefore, affirmed.
The petition does state, however, specific allegations regarding the disciplinary proceedings which, if true, would establish that the Department of Corrections failed to comply with its own rules and with the procedural requirements of Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a hearing as to the adequacy of the disciplinary proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Granger v. Fla. State Prison & Bill Price, 424 So. 2d 937 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)…State’s compliance with it. Specifically, Granger contends that he was denied his right to an administrative hearing pursuant to section 33-3.081(5)(a), Fla.Admin.Code, concerning his placement on close management confinement. In Bagley v. Brierton, 362 So. 2d 1048 (Fla.1st DCA 1978), this court held that the summary dismissal of a petition for writ of habeas corpus would be reversed and the matter remanded where the prisoner made specific allegations which, if true, would establish that the Department of Corr…
-
van Poyck v. Dugger, 579 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…appellate review of the subject order, that the allegations of the appellant’s habeas petition are true, we find that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing appellant’s petition for failure to state grounds for relief. See Bagley v. Brierton, 362 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion. SMITH, NIMMONS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur. . Van Poyck is a death penalty inmate at the Florida State Prison in Union County. The offense for which…
-
Rahming v. T.H. Bigham, 539 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…it can be done safely. In this case we have no record to review. We do not know whether Rahming’s confinement was reviewed according to administrative code requirements or whether the review, if given, satisfied due process. In Bagley v. Brierton, 362 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), this court held that a summary dismissal of a petition for writ of habeas corpus must be reversed and the matter remanded where the prisoner made specific allegations which, if true, would establish that the Department of Correc…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Wolff v. McDONNELL, 418 U.S. 539 (U.S. 1974)