GARY DEAN BARRETT, APPELLANT,
v.
EDWARD THOMAS REED ET UX., APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1978-09-12
No. JJ-58
SMITH, Acting C. J., and MELVIN, J., concur., BOOTH, J., dissents without opinion.
363 So. 2d 14 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1978)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that there was insufficient evidence of abandonment to justify terminating parental rights and adopting the child.


Facts & Procedural History

The father made no child support payments for 17 months, but the mother moved three times without informing him of their whereabouts, and relatives al…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

An appeal from an order granting adoption of appellant’s natural son to the mother and her new husband. We find insufficient evidence of abandonment and reverse.

The record reveals that appellant made no child support payments to his son for the 17 months between the dissolution of his marriage to the mother and the time of the hearing on this petition. Testimony also established, however, that the mother had moved with the child three times during that 17 month period without informing appellant of their whereabouts. Further, appellant inquired of the mother’s relatives and they denied knowing her address.

We find that the record does not at this point support a finding of abandonment sufficient to justify a permanent severance of parental ties between appellant and his son. Neither party satisfied their mutual obligations here. While it is true that appellant was neglectful in maintaining contact with his son, it is also true that the mother failed in her duty to inform the father of changes in the child’s address so that he could maintain such contact. Therefore, without prejudice to any future action based on additional facts, we reverse the trial court’s order of adoption.

REVERSED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and MELVIN, J., concur. BOOTH, J., dissents without opinion.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw