GEORGE ALLEN GOOLDE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Lewd Or Lascivious Molestation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Appellant’s convictions of two counts of lewd or lascivious molestation on victims less than twelve years old. See § 800.04(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006). In doing so, we note that the judgment contains a minor scrivener’s error, as each count is designated a first-degree felony punishable by life, when actually each is a life felony. While this offense was originally designated a felony of the first degree, it was elevated to a life felony by chapter 2005-28, effective September 1, 2005. See ch. 2005-28, §§ 5 & 28, Laws of Fla. The second amended information alleged that the offenses occurred on or about November 2005 through November 25, 2006. On remand, the court shall correct the scrivener’s error in the judgment to properly designate the two counts as life felonies. In all other respects, the judgments are affirmed.
AFFIRMED but REMANDED to correct scrivener’s error. ORFINGER, MONACO and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wheeler v. State, 210 So. 3d 87 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…. State, 529 So. 2d 286 (Fla.1988); State v. King, 426 So. 2d 12 (Fla.1982); Henry v. State, 933 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Desmond v. State, 576 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Melvin v. State, 177 So. 3d 648 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Goolde v. State, 978 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); Labadie v. State, 840 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); McMillan v. State, 832 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Hart v. State, 761 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.…
-
Royal v. State, 996 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)…he county. See Hicks v. State, 890 So. 2d 459, 462 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (holding that defendant did not willfully violate his probation by operating a kiosk in a mall because his probation officer gave him tacit permission to do so); McCarty v. State, 978 So. 2d 249, 249 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (holding that defendant’s discharge from one branch of a drug treatment program was not a willful violation of probation because his probation officer had authorized the defendant to report to another branch). Because we are…