DANTE GRANT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2008-06-11
No. 2D07-2642
STRINGER and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
983 So. 2d 730 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2008) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
WHATLEY, Judge.

WHATLEY, Judge.

Grant appeals his judgments and sentences for armed trafficking in cocaine and possession of marijuana. We affirm Grant’s convictions and sentences, but we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. Grant was found guilty of trafficking in cocaine and possession of marijuana. However, as the State correctly concedes, the written judgment improperly states that he was found guilty of armed trafficking in cocaine instead of trafficking in cocaine. Therefore, we remand for the trial court to correct the scrivener’s error so that the judgment and sentence accurately reflect the jurys verdict. Grant need not be present when the judgment and sentence are corrected.

Convictions and sentences affirmed; remanded for correction of scrivener’s error. STRINGER and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rodriguez v. State, 223 So. 3d 1053 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
    …victed on count 3 for discharging a firearm from a vehicle under section 790.15(2), Florida Statutes (2013). Because the judgment lists a conviction for the incorrect offense, remand is appropriate for - correction of this error. See Grant v. State, 983 So. 2d 730, 730 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (“[W] remand “for the trial court to correct the scrivener’s error so that the judgment and sentence [*1055] accurately reflect the jury’s verdict.”). Correspondingly, the trial court should amend the judgment for count 3 to…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw