ESTHER BOLEN
v.
MAX BOLEN
ESTHER BOLEN
MAX BOLEN
157 Fla. 783
Florida Supreme Court (1946)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 26 So. 2d 896
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Final decree granting divorce and settling property rights between the parties is affirmed, as no reversible error is made to appear.
*784So ordered.
CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Castro v. SUN Bank OF BAL Harbour, 370 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…ese circumstances, the final judgment is binding on these appellants irrespective of whether they were formal parties to the original action. See, e. g., Young v. Miami Beach Improvement Co., 46 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1950); State v. Gessner, 157 Fla. 798, 26 So. 2d 896 (1946), and City of New Port Richey v. State, 145 So. 2d 903 (Fla.2d DCA 1962). For the reasons set forth above and because no other reversible error has been shown, the summary final judgment appealed is affirmed. Affirmed. . The name “Fair Isle…