ELDRICK BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2008-06-18
No. 3D08-1246
Before SHEPHERD, CORTINAS, and SALTER, JJ.
985 So. 2d 1151 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2008) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*1152] PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the post-conviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rivero v. State, 15 So. 3d 625 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
    …iscovered evidence be made within two years of the time the facts become known or the defendant discovers such facts, since his motion was filed on August 31, 2007, within two years of the September 15, 2005 evidentiary hearing. See Slaton v. State, 985 So. 2d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). .Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b) reads as follows: (b) Time Limitations. A motion to vacate a sentence that exceeds the limits provided by law may be filed at any time. No other motion shall be filed or considered p…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw