VISTA VIEW APARTMENTS ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
HARDRIVES COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
BERANEK, Judge.
This matter is before us on interlocutory appeal and is governed by the 1977 Revision of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Although neither party has raised the question, we determine the order appealed is not within the permitted class of non-final orders which are subject to review pursuant to Rule 9.130. If the case is viewed as a petition for common law certiorari pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c), we are of the opinion that no adequate jurisdictional basis has been demonstrated.
If the order appealed is erroneous and remains uncorrected throughout the balance of the proceedings and if the appellant does suffer an adverse final judgment, then the entire matter may be reviewed on full appeal.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
CROSS and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Praet v. Martinez, 367 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…rules of appellate procedure, effective March 1,1978, and therefore dismiss the interlocutory appeal. Only the non-final orders specified in Fla. R.App.P. 9.130(a) are reviewable on interlocutory appeal. See Vista View Apartments v. Hardrives Co., 364 So. 2d 494 (Fla.4th DCA 1978). The order in question here is not one of them. Since no final default judgment, as opposed to the simple default involved in this case, had been entered below, the order does not fall within Fla.R. App.P. 9.130(a)(4) which states…