LEE PAUL DAVIS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
LEE PAUL DAVIS, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
990 So. 2d 16
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Lee Paul Davis appeals an order denying his motion for discharge on speedy trial grounds. We treat the appeal as a petition for writ of prohibition. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.040(c); Sherrod v. Franza, 427 So. 2d 161 (Fla.1983) (prohibition is the appropriate remedy to test the denial of a motion for discharge on speedy trial grounds). The state having shown that the pending charges against Davis have now been dismissed, we conclude that the issues raised in this proceeding have been rendered moot. Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is DISMISSED.
WOLF, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LeBLANC v. State, 997 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)…and remand to the trial court to attach record excerpts that conclusively demonstrate that Mr. LeBlanc is entitled to no relief. Failing that, the trial court must accord Mr. LeBlanc an evidentiary hearing on these four grounds. See Ingram v. State, 990 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 5th DCA2008). AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED. TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Sherrod v. The Honorable Arthur J. Franza, 427 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 1983)