BERNARD ISSAC BOBER, AS CANDIDATE FOR BROWARD COUNTY CIRCUIT JUDGE, GROUP 3, PETITIONER,
v.
PEDRO DIJOLS, AS CANDIDATE FOR BROWARD COUNTY CIRCUIT JUDGE, GROUP 3, AND BRENDA C. SNIPES, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENTS
BERNARD ISSAC BOBER, AS CANDIDATE FOR BROWARD COUNTY CIRCUIT JUDGE, GROUP 3, PETITIONER,
PEDRO DIJOLS, AS CANDIDATE FOR BROWARD COUNTY CIRCUIT JUDGE, GROUP 3, AND BRENDA C. SNIPES, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENTS
990 So. 2d 688
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2008)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 17 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We deny petitioner Bernard Issac Bo-ber’s September 18, 2008 emergency petition for writ of prohibition and/or quo war-ranto, with prejudice. See Pepper v. Cobo, 785 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Merrill v. Dade County Canvassing Bd., 300 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
Petition Denied.
KLEIN, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Norman v. Ambler, 46 So. 3d 178 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…constitutional eligibility for office, on the one hand, and, on the other, a constitutionally eligible candidate’s taking the necessary, statutory steps to qualify to run for office.7 The Fourth District discussed the distinction in Levey v. Dijols, 990 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), pointing out that “eligibility” for state office is determined solely by the constitutional requirements for holding the state office sought. The constitutional requirements pertinent here are set forth in Article III, section 1…
-
Brinkmann v. Tyron Francois, 184 So. 3d 504 (Fla. 2016)…(Fla.1969) (“Section 99.032, Florida Statutes, is unconstitutional, invalid and ineffective because it prescribes qualifications for the office of County Commissioner in addition to those prescribed by the Constitution,”). See also Levey v. Dijols, 990 So. 2d 688, 692 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (“Any statute that restricts eligibility beyond the requirements of the Florida Constitution is invalid.” (citing Miller v. Mendez, 804 So. 2d 1243, 1246 (Fla.2001))). As such, if any provision of the Florida Constitution pr…
-
Burns v. Lucie Tondreau, 139 So. 3d 481 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…484] Motion for Summary Judgment was rendered moot in light of the order granting dismissal. This appeal followed. II. ANALYSIS “[E]xtreme care must be given to post-election challenges to avoid disenfranchising Florida’s voters.” Levey v. Dijols, 990 So. 2d 688, 692 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Indeed, “barring fraud, unfairness, disfranchisement of voters, etc., it is too late to attack the validity of an election after the people have voted.” Baker v. State ex rel. Caldwell, 122 So. 2d 816, 826 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Jacqueline v. Pepper, 785 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
- Clark Merrill v. Dade Cnty. Canvassing Bd., 300 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)