CHARLES R. SPRIGGS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CHARLES R. SPRIGGS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
364 So. 2d 1253
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed. The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes. Smith v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).
Remanded for correction of the sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.
GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thornburg v. Pursell, 446 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)…mony as to the need for future medical expenses, the award is considered to be inadequate. Anderson v. Chirogianis, 384 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), aff'd., 401 So. 2d 1322 (Fla.1981). See also Hector v. Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., 364 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Under these circumstances it was error for the trial court to deny plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on the issue of damages. We have examined and reject the cross-appeal filed by the City of Arcadia. Accordingly, we affirm th…
-
Amparo Borges v. Jerome F. Jacobs, D.P.M. & Jerome F. Jacobs, D.P.M., P.A., 483 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…’ negligence, the verdict is inadequate as a matter of law, and a new trial is required. Gross v. Lee, 453 So. 2d 495 (Fla. [*774] 1st DCA 1984); Grier v. Reed, 426 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Hector v. Florida Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., 364 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); McNash v. Oxenhandler, 288 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Meana v. St. Petersburg Kennel Club, Inc., 279 So. 2d 329 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973); 1661 Corp. v. Snyder, 267 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). See also Griffis v. Hill, 230 So.…
-
McCLOUD v. Sherman Mobile Concrete Co., Inc., 579 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…new trial on the issue of Mr. McCloud’s damages and Mrs. McCloud’s consortium claim. Lofley v. Insultech, Inc., 527 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Thornburg v. Pursell, 446 So. 2d 713 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Hector v. Florida Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 364 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). Reversed and remanded for a new trial on the issue of damages. SCHEB and THREADGILL, JJ., concur. . The appellee in its answer brief states that "as a result of this fall on August 10, 1987, Mr. McCloud was examined and treate…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Smith v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
- Odom v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)