VIRGINIA Q. BEVERLY, AS JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. CHRISTINE MITCHELL, RESPONDENT
VIRGINIA Q. BEVERLY, AS JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. CHRISTINE MITCHELL, RESPONDENT
369 So. 2d 332
Florida Supreme Court (1979)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We issued a writ of certiorari in this ease based upon an alleged conflict between the decision in this case, reported at 333 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), and State v. Sampson, 317 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).
We are of the judgment that the conflict was resolved by State v. Williams, 350 So. 2d 81 (Fla.1977).
Accordingly, the writ is discharged.
ENGLAND, C. J., and BOYD, SUND-BERG and HATCHETT, JJ., concur. ADKINS, OVERTON and ALDERMAN, JJ., dissent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lawnwood Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Randall Seeger, M.D., 990 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 2008)…r construed the phrase “grant of privilege to a private corporation” and thus this is a case of first impression.9 Therefore, it is the duty of this Court to determine the meaning of this constitutional provision. Florida Comm’n on Ethics v. Plante, 369 So. 2d 332, 336 (Fla.1979) (citing Alsdorf v. Broward County, 333 So. 2d 457 (Fla.1976)). Our goal in construing a constitutional provision is to ascertain and effectuate the intent of the framers and voters. See Caribbean Conservation Corp. v. Florida Fish &…
-
Forsberg v. The Hous. Auth. OF the City OF Miami Beach & Murray Gilman, 455 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 1984)…atutory disclosure requirement could be created only by the legislature. Rose v. D’Alessandro, 380 So. 2d 419 (Fla.1980); Shevin v. Byron, Harless; Wait v. Florida Power & Light Co., 372 So. 2d 420 (Fla.1979); Florida Commission on Ethics v. Plante, 369 So. 2d 332 (Fla.1979); News-Press Publishing Co. v. Wisher, 345 So. 2d 646 (Fla.1977). It is important to note that the Fifth Circuit, in discussing Florida’s Public [*379] Records Act, stated that “it is clear that the legislature cannot authorize by statute…
-
Latham v. Fla. Comm'n ON Ethics, 694 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)…at, even if penalties result, it has no authority to impose “any penalty of any sort.” In support of these arguments, the Commission directs us to Commission on Ethics v. Sullivan, 489 So. 2d 10 (Fla.1986) and Florida Commission on Ethics v. Plante, 369 So. 2d 332 (Fla.1979). In Sullivan, the supreme court stated: [W]e held in Plante that a report of the commission “does not commence official action for discipline, nor does it in any other way penalize, affect qualifications, punish, or unseat an officehold…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Williams, 350 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 1977)
- Woodburn v. Woodburn, 333 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
- Mitchell v. State, 333 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
- State v. Sampson, 317 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)