BARBARA R. WOODBURN, APPELLANT (PETITIONER),

v.

GEORGE RICHARD WOODBURN, JR., APPELLEE (RESPONDENT)

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Mitchell, 347 So. 2d 610 (Fla. 1977)
  …KARL, Justice, concurring specially. I agree with the majority decision discharging the writ of certiorari because the decision of the District Court of Appeal, 333 So. 2d 89, First District, is not in conflict with any other decision of this court or any District Court of Appeal in this state. More specifically, their decision does not conflict with Green v. State, 113 Fla. 237, 151 So. 898 (1934).…
• Gaines v. State, 406 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …nificant where burglaries of same premises occurred within three-week period); Jackson v. State, 350 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977) (date of offense significant where alibi defense directed to specific date charged in information); Mitchell v. State, 333 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976) (date of offense significant where alibi defense directed to specific date charged in information); Smith v. State, 253 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971) (date of offense significant where act of bribery occurred after proceeding be…
• Jackson v. State, 350 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)
  …on. Appellant contends the trial court committed reversible error in giving the previously mentioned instruction over his objection. We agree and reverse. The First District Court of Appeal recently considered this same point in Mitchell v. State, 333 So. 2d 89 (Fla.1st DCA 1976). After reviewing the relevant facts, which are parallel in all material aspects to those in the present case, Judge Smith said: It follows that, in the circumstances of this ease, the trial court erred in charging the jury in eff…