RAYMOND ROMINE, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1978-11-07
No. 78-69
Before BARKDULL and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.
369 So. 2d 957 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1978) Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cheney v. Dade County, 353 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Romine v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 401 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
    …Compare: Elliott v. City of Hollywood, 399 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Therefore, for the reasons above stated, the summary final judgment here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.2 Affirmed. . Romine v. Metropolitan Dade County, 369 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). . The case still pends in the trial court against the defendant driver.…
  • Romine v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 385 So. 2d 1368 (Fla. 1980)
    …PER CURIAM. This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, Romine v. Metropolitan Dade County, 369 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). In its per curiam affirmance of the trial court’s summary judgment, the district court expressly relied on Cheney v. Dade County, 353 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), a case which this Court has recently disapproved. See Commercial…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw