EMILIO XIQUES, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Emilio Xiques, Jr., appeals the summary denial of his motion for credit reduction of sentence brought pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. In his motion appellant sought to have the trial judge credit his sentence with time served before the date he was sentenced. We reverse.
The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1977). Smith v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).
The order denying appellant relief on his motion is reversed, and the case is remanded for correction of the sentence.
GRIMES, C. J., and RYDER and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Walker v. State, 397 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)…February 13, 1980.” The judgment and sentence in this case are affirmed. However, the orders are remanded so that the trial judge may specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed. § 921.161(1), Fla.Stat. (1977); Xiques v. State, 369 So. 2d 1007 (Fla.2d DCA 1979). SCHEB, C. J., and GRIMES and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.…
-
Ins. Co. OF N. Am. & John Menninger v. Pasakarnis, 425 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)…care does not require that it be done.10 Sea Board Air Line R. Co. v. Watson, 94 Fla. 571, 113 So. 716 (1927); Florida East Coast R. Co. v. Lassiter, 59 Fla. 246, 52 So. 975 (1910) (contributory negligence); St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co. v. White, 369 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert. denied, 378 So. 2d 349 (Fla.1979). In addition, since there are sincerely-held conflicting views as to the merits of seat belts and whether they might under some circumstances cause even more serious injury, a decision not…
-
Steinberg v. Lomenick, 531 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…y . that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a new trial on the ground that it should have given plaintiffs proposed instruction on the effect of a violation of industry standards. Likewise, St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. v. White, 369 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), concerned violations of industry standards and statutes, and thus does not support the proposition that a violation of defendant’s internal rules is evidence of negligence. While we question the propriety of these rulings which…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Smith v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
- Odom v. State, 310 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)