HARRY BROOK, APPELLANT,
v.
PROTEAN INVESTORS, INC., A NEW YORK CORP., AND PARMAN FLORIDA, INC., A FLORIDA CORP., APPELLEES
HARRY BROOK, APPELLANT,
PROTEAN INVESTORS, INC., A NEW YORK CORP., AND PARMAN FLORIDA, INC., A FLORIDA CORP., APPELLEES
373 So. 2d 440
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1979)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Clifford Ragsdale, Inc. v. Morganti, Inc., 356 So. 2d 1321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Neida’s Boutique, Inc. v. Gabor and Company, 348 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Weiner v. Lozman and Weinberg, P. A., 340 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Miami Auto Auction, Inc. v. Friendly Enterprises, Inc., 257 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Reynolds v. Deep South Sports, Inc., 211 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Edward L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Sunbeam Television Corp., 413 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…nd it is impossible to tell from the opinions whether plaintiffs were, in fact, given a separate notice of the motion for dismissal with prejudice. Singh v. Tolz, 380 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (Rule 1.540(b)); Brook v. Protean Investors, Inc., 373 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Miami Auto Auction, Inc. v. Friendly Enterprises, Inc., 257 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); Reynolds v. Deep South Sports, Inc., 211 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968). We consider as incorrectly decided those cases which either express…
-
Consultants & Designers & Cigna Cos. v. Brown, 677 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…injunction); Chesler v. Hendler, 428 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 4th DCA) (fact that order dissolved temporary injunction did not permit interlocutory appeal of other issues adjudicated in same order), review denied, 437 So. 2d 677 (Fla.1983); Cruse v. Cruse, 373 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (fact that order in dissolution of marriage ease awarded temporary support did not permit interlocutory appeal of rulings in same order on discovery issues). We have been unable to find any decision to the contrary. Having conclu…
-
Chesler v. Hyman B. Hendler, 428 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)…able as a non-final appeal pursuant to Rule 9.130(a). Nor does the fact that the dissolution of the temporary injunction is contained in the same order make the remainder of the questions contained therein reviewable under that rule. Cruse v. Cruse, 373 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1979). However, we elected to review the disqualification of counsel by writ of common law certiorari. Having considered all of the plaintiffs’ arguments, both procedural and substantive, pertaining to the dissolution of the temporary…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Clifford Ragsdale, Inc. v. Morganti, Inc., 356 So. 2d 1321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
- Reynolds v. Deep S. Sports, Inc., 211 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
- Miami Auto Auction, Inc. v. Friendly Enters., Inc., 257 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Fasce, 348 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Neida's Boutique, Inc. v. Gabor & Co., 348 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Michael Weiner, M.D. v. Lozman & Weinberg, P.A., 340 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)