DOROTHY COOPER, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CLARENCE COOPER, DEED., AND DOROTHY COOPER, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANT,
v.
DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, D/B/A JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1979-07-31
No. 79-1092
Before HENDRY, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ.
373 So. 2d 442 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1979) Caution
Cited by 22 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. Scavella v. Fernandez, 371 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Perez v. Miami Dade Water & Sewer Authority, 372 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (11 total)

  • Stith v. Stith, 384 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)
    …to the wife in the event of her death or remarriage prior to his death. The husband’s income justifies a requirement that the husband pay the premiums on those life insurance policies as a form of additional periodic alimony. Cf. Cyphers v. Cyphers, 373 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) (the requirement that a husband contribute a monthly amount toward a major medical insurance policy for the wife considered part of the wife’s permanent periodic alimony). Accordingly, we reverse the award of lump sum alimony in…
  • Miller v. Miller, 466 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
    …lished that a trial court, in its discretion, may order a former husband to pay a reasonable amount for medical insurance premiums for the wife as part of an alimony award. Inglett v. Inglett, 439 So. 2d 1389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Cyphers v. Cyphers, 373 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Blass v. Blass, 316 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). The husband does not argue that he is unable to obtain medical insurance at a reasonable cost, rather he claims that the requirement that he pay all of the wife’s medical and den…
  • Lambert v. Lambert, 403 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
    …er has the right to exclusive possession of the marital home. Lambert properly requested partition incident to his request to modify. See Horn, supra. Because he met the pleading requirements of § 64.041 governing partition, see Cyphers v. Cyphers, 373 So. 2d 442 (Fla.2d DCA 1979), and because he had a right to immediate possession through modification of the original dissolution decree, he now has a right to partition as a tenant in common. Condrey v. Condrey, 92 So. 2d 423 (Fla.1957). Because we held in th…

Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw