THE LAW FIRM OF PATTERSON, MALONEY, BLYLER & FEIGE, PETITIONER,

v.

GERTRUDE KAHN KOEBRICH, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• C. S. v. State, 390 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …or speedy trial, without a finding that the interests of justice will be served by such extension and a recitation of the reasons for such extension, as required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.180(c). See: In Interest of J.R.S. v. Hastings, 374 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); In Interest of R.L.P. v. Korda, 380 So. 2d 1329 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Therefore, absent a showing that the appellant was in any way at fault in delaying the adjudicatory hearing, we must reverse the order appealed and remand th…
• In the Interest of M. B. v. LEE, 388 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
  …elf and requested counsel, a valid reason for continuance and extension of speedy trial, a brief order would have satisfied the rule. See In the Interest of R.L.P. v. Korda, 380 So. 2d 1329 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); In the Interest of J.R.S. v. Hastings, 374 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).…
• M. M. v. State, 407 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …at order did not extend the speedy trial period pursuant to the same Fla.R.Juv.P. 8.180(e), but merely reflected the continuance. There can be no extension of the speedy trial period without the entry of an order of extension. J. R. S. v. Hastings, 374 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). An oral continuance does not extend the speedy trial time absent a finding that the interests of justice will be served by such an extension. C. S. v. State, 390 So. 2d 457 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The state’s reliance on State v. Ke…

Authorities Cited

• Lloyd Herold, P.A. v. Hunt, 327 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)