D. P. ELLIS, ET AL.,
v.
JOHN STRICKLAND, ET AL.
D. P. ELLIS, ET AL.,
JOHN STRICKLAND, ET AL.
158 Fla. 736
Florida Supreme Court (1947)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 30 (2nd) 100
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Whereas it appears that in the final decree the name of “John Stallings” is used where the name “John Strickland” should have been used, it is directed that the final decree be modified by inserting the name “John Strickland” where the name “John Stallings” was inadvertently used.
The decree when so modified is affirmed on authority of our opinion and judgment in Partin v. Tucker, 126 Fla. 817, 172 So. 89.
So ordered.
THOMAS, C. J., BUFORD, ADAMS and BARNS, JJ.,concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Raymond v. Est. Of Robert Kaufman, 505 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…peal, save one. The final judgment under review should be modified, we conclude, so as to substitute the personal representative of the estate of Robert Kaufman for the estate of Robert Kaufman as the prevailing party below. See Ellis v. Strickland, 158 Fla. 736, 30 So. 2d 100 (1947); §§ 733.607, 733.612(20), Fla.Stat. (1985); 18 Fla.Jur.2d Decedents’ Property §§ 696-99 (1980); cf. Adler v. Adler, 418 So. 2d 1007, 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Becker v. King, 307 So. 2d 855, 859 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert, dismissed,…
Authorities Cited
- Partin v. Tucker, 126 Fla. 817 (Fla. 1937)