BARBARA RAYMOND, APPELLANT,
v.
ESTATE OF ROBERT KAUFMAN, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1987-03-31
No. 86-1843
Before BARKDULL and HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.
505 So. 2d 529 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1987) Caution
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a final judgment entered below based on an adverse jury verdict in a breach of contract action. We see no merit in any of the points raised on appeal, save one. The final judgment under review should be modified, we conclude, so as to substitute the personal representative of the estate of Robert Kaufman for the estate of Robert Kaufman as the prevailing party below. See Ellis v. Strickland, 158 Fla. 736, 30 So. 2d 100 (1947); §§ 733.607, 733.612(20), Fla.Stat. (1985); 18 Fla.Jur.2d Decedents’ Property §§ 696-99 (1980); cf. Adler v. Adler, 418 So. 2d 1007, 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Becker v. King, 307 So. 2d 855, 859 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert, dismissed, 317 So. 2d 76 (Fla.1975). This modification may be accomplished by the trial court upon the rendition of our mandate in this cause. As thus modified, the final judgment under review is

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Nilo A. Hernandez, 708 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
    …d District case likewise concluded that it was permissible for a municipality to treat different code violations differently, in that case, handling fire code violations with a different procedure than other city code violations. See Deehl v. Weiss, 505 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). The Deehl Court reasoned that Chapter 162’s intent was not to force counties and cities to choose Part I exclusively or Part II exclusively for all code and ordinance violations, but its intent was merely to preclude the counties…
  • Goodman v. Cnty. Court IN Broward Cnty., 711 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
    …f writ to instances of serious departure from essential requirements of law). Petitioner contends that both City of Tampa for Use and Benefit of City of Tampa Code Enforcement Board v. Braxton, 616 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), and Deehl v. Weiss, 505 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), stand for the proposition that where a municipality elects to form a code enforcement board and delegate to it the enforcement of certain code provisions, it cannot prosecute those same code violations in any other manner. We dis…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw