ODEN A. SCHAEFFER ET UX,
v.
GERDA V. YOUNG (FORMERLY GERDA V. SCHAEFFER) AND ALFRED YOUNG, HER HUSBAND

Fla. | 1947-04-22
THOMAS, C. J., ADAMS and BARNS, JJ., concur.
158 Fla. 749 Florida Supreme Court (1947) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 30 (2nd) 100
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
BUFORD, J.:

BUFORD, J.:

This is the third appearance of the issues involved in this case here. See Young et al v. Schaeffer, 155 Fla. 887, 22 So. (2) 252; Schaeffer et al v. Young et al, 157 Fla. 611, 26 So. (2) 725. The principles of law presented and determined in our disposition of those cases are identical with those presented on this appeal.

In fact, the burden of the insistence made by the appellant is that we reconsider our action in those cases and now overrule what was held in those cases and thereupon to reverse the decree which is the basis of this decree.

We find no error in the decree and, therefore, the same is affirmed on authority of our opinions and judgments in the cases above referred to.

So ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., ADAMS and BARNS, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • In re Stoller, 160 Fla. 769 (Fla. 1948)
    …osecution and punishment but the approach to it should be through democratic processes. It, therefore, follows that an application for reinstatement to practice law may be peremptorially denied; it may be granted with reservations as In Re: Lambdin, 158 Fla. 749, 30 So. (2nd) 191, or it may be granted unconditionally as In Re: Hurtenbach, 157 Fla. 871, 27 So. (2nd) 348. In Re: Lathero, 157 Fla. 630, 26 So. (2nd) 677; like disbarment, it may be complete or partial. Measured by the foregoing test, has petiti…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw