GERDA V. YOUNG (FORMERLY GERDA V. SCHAEFFER), AND ALFRED YOUNG, HER HUSBAND,
v.
ODEN A. SCHAEFFER

Fla. | 1945-04-27
CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
155 Fla. 887 Florida Supreme Court (1945) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 22 So. 2d 252
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

*888PER CURIAM:

Petition for certiorari is granted and the final decree of the circuit court is quashed but with leave to amend if desired. See Straus v. Straus, 148 Fla. 23, 3 So. (2nd) 727; Kollar v. Kollar, 155 Fla. 705, 21 So. (2nd) 356.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Oden A. Schaeffer and Louise A. Schaeffer v. Gerba V. Schaeffer Young and Alfred Young, 157 Fla. 611 (Fla. 1946)
    …plaint and requiring defendants to answer within ten days from the date of the order. On April 27, 1945, this Court disposed of the matter by granting certiorari and quashing the order of the lower court with leave to amend. See Young v. Schaeffer, 155 Fla. 887, 22 So. (2nd) 252. After the mandate went down plaintiff filed an amended bill of complaint. The defendants again moved to dismiss. After notice and hearing, the court entered its order dismissing the bill of complaint with prejudice. We have care…
  • Oden A. Schaeffer et ux v. Gerda V. Young (formerly Gerda V. Schaeffer) and Alfred Young, 158 Fla. 749 (Fla. 1947)
    …BUFORD, J.: This is the third appearance of the issues involved in this case here. See Young et al v. Schaeffer, 155 Fla. 887, 22 So. (2) 252; Schaeffer et al v. Young et al, 157 Fla. 611, 26 So. (2) 725. The principles of law presented and determined in our disposition of those cases are identical with those presented on this appeal. In fact, the burden of the insistence…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw