SUN BANK OF MIAMI, A FLORIDA BANKING CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA F/K/A BOULEVARD NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, A CORPORATION, RICHARD ERNEST DAVIDS, APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Appellant/plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any equitable or legal basis for relief. See Doing v. Reilly, 176 F. 2d 449 (5th Cir. 1949); Maryland Casualty Co. v. Krasnek, 174 So. 2d 541 (Fla.1965); Johnson v. Green, 54 So. 2d 44 (Fla.1951); Quinn v. Phipps, 93 Fla. 805, 113 So. 419 (1927); Leitner v. Willaford, 306 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); See also, Chapters 678 and 679, Florida Statutes (1977), and 33 Fla.Jur. Trusts § 61.
PEARSON, Judge,
concurring in part, dissenting in part.
I concur fully with the affirmance on all issues raised by the appellant concerning its rights against appellee National Bank of Florida. However, I am unable to understand the court’s failure to proceed with the case and enter a money judgment for the appellant against appellee Richard E. Davids. See Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Safford Bros. Produce Co., 121 Fla. 833, 164 So. 681 (1935), and Casas v. Rosell, 359 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). I would reverse that portion of the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings to determine the personal liability of Davids.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Donner v. Hetherington, 399 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…SCHWARTZ, Judge. For the third time, Ms. Donner appeals from an adverse judgment in her false imprisonment action. For the third time, we reverse. At the retrial required by Donner v. Hetherington, 376 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979),1 the trial judge directed a verdict at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case in favor of the defendant Hethering-ton, the Miami police officer who originally took Donner into custody, as well as the city itself, and their insura…
-
Donner v. Appalachian Ins. Co., 580 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…96 Fla. 756, 759, 119 So. 131, 132 (1928). We trust that trial of this cause will occur before this litigation assumes such Dickensian proportions. Affirmed. . See Donner v. Hetherington, 399 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Donner v. Hetherington, 376 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Donner v. Hetherington, 370 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). . See Edelstein v. Donner, 450 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), approved, 471 So. 2d 26 (Fla.1985); Donner v. Edelstein, 425 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Donner v. Ede…
-
Kleinschmidt v. Gator Off. Supply & Furniture, Inc., 551 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…comply with these orders, and, accordingly, a dismissal of the action was plainly an inappropriate remedy. See Muhtar v. Aetna Ins. Co., 456 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Davis v. Freeman, 405 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Donner v. Hetherington, 376 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). As to the failure to comply with the interrogatory and discovery production order, the plaintiff was given but one opportunity to comply with this order prior to the dismissal order and, accordingly, a dismissal of the action was…
Authorities Cited
- Porte F. Quinn v. Phipps, 113 So. 419 (Fla. 1927)
- Md. Cas. Co. v. Krasnek, 174 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 1965)
- Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Saffold Bros. Produce Co., 121 Fla. 833 (Fla. 1935)
- Doing v. Riley, 176 F.2d 449 (5th Cir. 1949)
- Johnson v. Green, 54 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 1951)
- Leitner v. Emory J. Willaford, 306 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
- Casas v. Rosell, 359 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)