CHARLES WEAVER, WEAVER BONDING AGENCY AND ACCREDITED SURETY & CASUALTY COMPANY, INC., SURETIES, APPELLANTS,

v.

DONNA M. MASANOTTI AND FRANCISCO MASANOTTI, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Barreiro v. Barreiro, 377 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …t was plainly improper, and clearly in violation of the appellant’s due process rights, to hea.r and determine matters which were not the subject of appropriate pleadings or notice. Cortina v. Cortina, 98 So. 2d 334 (Fla.1957); Matthews v. Matthews, 376 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and cases cited; Koken v. Neubauer, 374 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and cases cited. Accordingly, with the sole exception of paragraph 1, which dealt with the summer visitation issue, the order of July 25, 1979 under review is,…
• Fickle v. Adkins, 394 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …ights of the parties1 in that (1) it determined matters not noticed for hearing and not the subject of appropriate pleadings, Cortina v. Cortina, 98 So. 2d 334 (Fla.1957); Barreiro v. Barreiro, 377 So. 2d 999 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); Matthews v. Matthews, 376 So. 2d 484 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); (2) to the limited extent that it determined matters noticed for hearing and properly before the court, it was entered without providing the parties a full and fair opportunity to be heard and present evidence, Christiansen v. Chr…
• Perez v. Perez, 519 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
  …2d 490 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Heritage Casket & Vault Ind., Inc. v. Sunshine Bank, 428 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); see also Cortina v. Cortina, 98 So. 2d 334 (Fla.1957); Barreiro v. Barreiro, 377 So. 2d 999 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Matthews v. Matthews, 376 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); (c) that portion of the judgment granting “custody” of the parties’ child was plainly erroneous both because the complaint did not comply with section 61.1308 or 61.132, Florida Statutes (1985), and because the relief granted was…