NORMAN ROBBINS, APPELLANT,
v.
BLACKSTONE VALLEY NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Full Faith And Credit Clause cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The final judgment appealed from is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) the parties through parol agreement stipulated to the entry of judgment upon the submission of certain briefs and memoranda, which stipulation was properly made a part of the record through a court order and could not later be challenged subsequent to the entry of judgment made pursuant to the stipulation, Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Redding, 47 Fla. 228, 37 So. 62 (1904) (court syllabus no. 12); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.030(d); and (b) the foreign judgment herein was facially valid and was, therefore, entitled to be domesticated by the final judgment appealed from either under the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution [U.S. Const, art. IV, § 1] or as a matter of comity. Gaylord v. Gaylord, 45 So. 2d 507 (Fla.1950); Herron v. Passailaigue, 92 Fla. 818, 110 So. 539 (1926); Barnett Bank of Clearwater, N. A. v. Folsom, 306 So. 2d 186 (Fla.2d DCA 1975).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ranzel Davis v. State, 474 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)…to two years in prison. It is conceded on appeal that the only evidence to support the probation violation of failure to pay the cost of supervision was hearsay. Since probation may not be revoked based solely upon hearsay evidence, Curry v. State, 379 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), that ground should be excised from the written order of revocation, together with grounds III, IV, V, VI, and VII, which were also set forth therein, because these grounds were not heard by the court. [*1247] This leaves us in d…
-
Theron Thomas v. State, 672 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)…cessfully complete a designated rehabilitation program, some evidence must be submitted to show that the defendant was in some manner responsible for such failure.” Miller v. State, 661 So. 2d 353, 354-55 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (quoting Curry v. State, 379 So. 2d 140, 141 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)); Gibbs v. State, 609 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). If a probationer makes reasonable efforts to comply, his failure will not be considered willful. See Steiner, 604 So. 2d at 1268; Gardner v. State, 365 So. 2d 1053, 1054 (…
-
Ovid Miller v. State, 661 So. 2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)…y plainly insufficient hearsay evidence that he had not, the trial court’s finding that the defendant had violated his probation by failing to report for a drug program evaluation was not supported by competent evidence. Likewise, in Curry v. State, 379 So. 2d 140, 141 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), evidence consisting solely of hearsay reports as to the defendant’s conduct while attending a drug rehabilitation program could not support a finding that the defendant violated the terms of his probation where the defendan…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Herron v. Emil E. Passailaigue, 92 Fla. 818 (Fla. 1926)
- The Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Redding, 47 Fla. 228 (Fla. 1904)
- Gaylord v. Gaylord, 45 So. 2d 507 (Fla. 1950)
- Barnett Bank OF Clearwater, N.A. v. Folsom, 306 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)