HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL, PETITIONER,
v.
MARY BERCIER, RESPONDENT

Fla. 4th DCA | 1980-01-09
No. 79-1675
ANSTEAD, J., and CROSS, SPENCER C., Associate Judge, concur.
379 So. 2d 141 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1980)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Holy Cross Hospital challenged a judicial referee's termination of a medical malpractice mediation proceeding on the ground that no hearing was held within 120 days. The court held that a notice of final hearing issued before the 120-day deadline constitutes an implicit extension under Florida law, and that the respondent's delay in serving the complaint provided good cause for extension.


Holding

The court held that a written notice of hearing issued prior to expiration of the 120-day period and setting a hearing date beyond that period constitutes an implicit extension of time under Section 768.44(3), Florida Statutes, even without a formal motion to extend. The respondent's excessive delay in serving the complaint provided adequate good cause for the extension as required by Medical Mediation Rule 20.160(e).


Headnotes

[1] A written notice of hearing issued prior to the expiration of the 120-day period, setting the final hearing for a date beyond that period, constitutes an extension of tim…

[2] A respondent's excessive delay in serving a complaint can constitute good cause for extending the time for a medical mediation hearing.

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“The written notice of hearing issued prior to the expiration of the 120 day period setting the final hearing for June 29, 1979 (a date beyond the 120 day period) constitutes an extension of time envisioned by Section 768.44(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978), albeit no formal motion to extend the time had been filed.”

Establishes that implicit extensions are valid under the statute when proper notice is given before the deadline.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

On January 16, 1979, Mary Bercier filed a medical malpractice claim against Holy Cross Hospital but never served it. An amended complaint was filed Ma…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
DOWNEY, Chief Judge.

DOWNEY, Chief Judge.

By Petition for Writ of Certiorari review is sought of an order of the judicial referee confirming termination of a medical mediation proceeding.

It appears from the petition that “On January 16, 1979, the respondent, Mary Bercier, filed a medical malpractice claim against the Hospital. This complaint was never served and a copy of it was never mailed to the Hospital. On March 7, 1979, (52 days later) an ‘amended complaint’ was filed. This complaint was served on the Hospital on March 12, 1979 (57 days later). No leave of court1 was sought or received for filing this complaint. The Hospital filed an answer to the complaint on March 14, 1979.

“A ‘Notice of Final Hearing’ was entered by the judicial referee on April 3, 1979, setting the final hearing for June 29, 1979. However, on May 17,1979, the clerk’s office issued its certificate terminating jurisdiction on the ground that:

A hearing has not been held within 120 days from the date of the filing of the claim and no extension order has been entered by the judicial referee.

The clerk’s certificate was entered four months after the original complaint was filed (but never served) and about seventy-one days after the ‘amended complaint’ was filed and served. On May 21, 1979, the Hospital filed a ‘Motion to Set Aside Clerk’s Certificate Termination of Jurisdiction’ and on May 31, 1979, the Hospital filed a ‘Motion For Clarification of Termination Order, and For Extension of Jurisdiction.’

“On June 18, 1978 (sic),2 Judge Orlando entered the following order on these motions:

1. That the original claim was filed on January 16, 1979; that the final hearing was not commenced within 120 days of original filing and defendant failed to file a Motion, or. otherwise seek, to extend jurisdiction beyond the 120 day period.

2. That jurisdiction of the above-entitled action has terminated as a matter of law on May 17,1979, and the parties may proceed in accordance with law.”

Upon the filing of the petition this court issued a rule commanding the respondent to file a response. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition and a memorandum in support thereof, but failed to file any response.

We have considered the petition and respondent’s motion to dismiss and memorandum in support thereof and find that the judicial referee departed from the essential requirements of law. The written notice of hearing issued prior to the expiration of the 120 day period setting the final hearing for June 29, 1979 (a date beyond the 120 day period) constitutes an extension of time envisioned by Section 768.44(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1978), albeit no formal motion to extend the time had been filed. Thames v. Melvin, 365 So. 2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). The record demonstrates there was adequate good cause for the extension as required by Medical Mediation Rule 20.160(e). We consider the respondent’s excessive delay in serving the complaint upon petitioner as good cause for the extension.

Accordingly, the Petition for Certiorari is granted and the order of the judicial referee .confirming termination of jurisdiction is quashed and the cause is remanded to the judicial referee for reinstatement of the medical mediation proceeding.

ANSTEAD, J., and CROSS, SPENCER C., Associate Judge, concur. . We assume petitioner means no leave of the judicial referee was obtained since this was a medical mediation proceeding.

. It is clear this order was entered June 18, 1979.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw