WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. (SELF-INSURED), APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
WILLIE WILLIAMS, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A general comprehensive liability insurance policy provided coverage for damages resulting from the insured's delivery of the wrong product to a customer, despite policy exclusions for products hazards and completed operations, because the policy's general terms covered the loss.
The general comprehensive liability insurance policy provided coverage for the damages resulting from the misdelivery of the herbicide, as the policy's general terms covered the loss, and the exclusions did not apply to the specific facts of the case.
A chemical supplier delivered a herbicide instead of an insecticide to a customer, destroying the customer's tobacco crop. The customer settled the cl…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Permanent Partial Disability Benefits cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The record reveals that the claimant worked for one week in one construction job, and for nine weeks in another construction job during the time he was found to be temporarily totally disabled. The deputy commissioner failed to take cognizance of this evidence in ordering the carrier to:
[Rjeclassify all permanent partial disability benefits paid prior to August 30, 1977, as temporary total disability benefits, . pay to the claimant temporary total disability benefits from the date permanent partial disability benefits terminated until August 30, 1977, .
The order, otherwise affirmed, is reversed as to this award, and the cause is remanded to the deputy commissioner for a new order consistent with this opinion. See MJM Construction Co. v. Roberts, IRC Order 2-3387 (March 31, 1978); Purcell v. Douglas, 8 FCR 375 (1974), cert. denied, 302 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 1974).
ERVIN, SHIVERS and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Standard Constr. & Assocs. & Cont'l Nat'l Am. Ins. Grp. v. Kinsler, 394 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)…logical to conclude that a claimant is totally disabled during a period of time when the evidence shows that the claimant could and did work. Cling Electric, Inc. v. Jones, 376 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Williams, 379 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). As a second ground for reversal, the record indicates that the deputy found the claimant to be TTD even when he was not suffering the effects of the rash. TTD is defined as the healing period during which the claimant is by reas…
-
Fort Pierce Utils. & Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Edmond J. Blotney, 396 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)…o find entitlement to temporary total disability benefits during periods where the claimant is working full-time in non-sheltered employment. Cling Electric, Inc. v. Jones, 376 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Williams, 379 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Standard Construction & Associates v. Kinsler, 394 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) [1981 FLW 568]; MJM Construction Co. v. Roberts, IRC Order 2-3387 (March 31, [*854] 1978). The evidence here fails to support claimant’s entitlem…
Authorities Cited
- Craftsmen's Vill., Inc. v. Benach, 302 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 1974)