FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AND AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
v.
EDMOND J. BLOTNEY, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1981-04-14
No. UU-420
ERVIN, BOOTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
396 So. 2d 852 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1981) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Fort Pierce Utilities and Aetna Casualty appealed a workers' compensation order awarding the claimant various benefits. The court affirmed most of the award but reversed and remanded the portion awarding temporary total disability benefits during periods when the claimant was actively working and receiving full wages.


Holding

The court reversed the award of temporary total disability benefits from November 14, 1978 until April 15, 1979, because the claimant was working full-time during this period and receiving full wages, which exceeds the requirements of the Workers' Compensation Law. The court affirmed the award of temporary total disability benefits from April 15, 1979 until maximum medical improvement on November 6, 1979, as supported by substantial competent evidence.


Headnotes

[1] Temporary total disability benefits are not recoverable for periods during which a claimant is working full-time in non-sheltered employment.

[2] An employer's payment of a claimant's full salary during a period of disability may exceed the requirements of workers' compensation law.

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Temporary total disability is the healing period during which a claimant is by reason of the injury totally disabled and unable to work.”

Establishes the legal definition of temporary total disability that guides the court's analysis

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The claimant was injured on October 20, 1978. He worked full-time in non-sheltered employment from November 14, 1978 until March 4, 1979, and received…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Employer/carrier appeal a worker’s compensation order which awarded claimant temporary total disability benefits, permanent partial disability benefits, future palliative medical treatment, hospitalization expenses, statutory penalties, and attorney’s fees. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Employer/carrier contend the deputy commissioner erred in awarding claimant temporary total disability benefits from the date of his accident, October 20, 1978, until the date of maximum medical improvement, November 6, 1979, with credit for all compensation or wages paid during this period of time. Employer/carrier argue, in part, that this award was erroneous because the evidence shows that claimant was working full-time from November 14, 1978 until March 4,1979, and received full wages until April 15, 1979.

Temporary total disability is the healing period during which a claimant is by reason of the injury totally disabled and unable to work. Concord Realty Corp. v. Romano, 159 Fla. 1, 30 So. 2d 495 (Fla.1947). It is error to find entitlement to temporary total disability benefits during periods where the claimant is working full-time in non-sheltered employment. Cling Electric, Inc. v. Jones, 376 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Williams, 379 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Standard Construction & Associates v. Kinsler, 394 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) [1981 FLW 568]; MJM Construction Co. v. Roberts, IRC Order 2-3387 (March 31, 1978). The evidence here fails to support claimant’s entitlement to temporary total disability benefits from November 14, 1978 until March 4, 1979. Further, it was error to order the carrier to pay claimant temporary total disability benefits from March 4, 1979 until April 15, 1979 since the payment by the employer of claimant’s full salary during such period of time exceeds the requirements of the Worker’s Compensation Law. Brevard County Board of County Commissioners v. Brubaker, IRC Order 2-2682 (July 9, 1974), cert, denied, 312 So. 2d 760 (Fla.1975). We find no error in the award of temporary total disability benefits from April 15, 1979 until the date of maximum medical improvement, November 6, 1979, since this award is supported by substantial competent evidence.

We have considered the numerous other issues raised by employer/carrier and find no reversible error. Accordingly, that portion of the order awarding temporary total disability benefits from November 14, 1978 until April 15,1979 is reversed and remanded for further consideration consistent herewith. All other portions of the appealed order are affirmed. .

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

ERVIN, BOOTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • H.G. Boddiford Painting Contractors, Inc. v. Boddiford, 426 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
    …was sought first for the TTD benefits allegedly over-paid. Temporary total disability has been defined as the “healing period during which a claimant is by reason of the injury totally disabled and unable to work.” Fort Pierce Utilities v. Blotney, 396 So. 2d 852, 853 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). We have consistently held that it is error to award TTD benefits to a claimant who is capable of obtaining and performing some type of work. See Blot-ney (claimant working full-time in non-sheltered employment); McDonnell D…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw