PLANNING RESEARCH COMPANY AND HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP, APPELLANTS,
v.
JESSE E. SHY, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1980-02-20
No. QQ-299
ERVIN, SHIVERS and SHAW; JJ., concur.
379 So. 2d 1047 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

This is a case of first impression which squarely poses the issue of whether, under appropriate circumstances, treatment at a pain clinic constitutes remedial treatment pursuant to § 440.13(1), Florida Statutes. We hold that it does. Cf. Goldsmith v. Buena Vista Construction Co., 304 So. 2d 110 (Fla.1974).

ERVIN, SHIVERS and SHAW; JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cent. OIL Co. & Peninsular Fire Ins. Co. v. Campen, 390 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
    …, is inapplicable for the same reason. See Lu-Mar Enterprises, Inc. v. Mazur, 8 FCR 248, 249 (1974). We recognize that treatment at a pain clinic may constitute remedial treatment pursuant to § 440.13(1), Fla.Stat. See Planning Research Co. v. Shy, 379 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). Also, § 440.13(2), Fla. Stat., provides that a Deputy “may at any time, for good cause shown, .. . order a change in such remedial attention, care, or attendance.” (emphasis supplied) Here, however, there was no showing of good…
  • Johnson v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
    …in Florida is granted by the sovereign as a matter of grace rather than of right, and the State may offer such grace under and subject to such conditions as it may consider most conducive to accomplish the desired purpose.” Panzavecchia v. Crockett, 379 So. 2d 1047, 1048 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); see also § 947.002(5), Fla. Stat. (expressing “the intent of the Legislature that the decision to parole an inmate from the incarceration portion of [his] sentence is an act of grace of the state and shall not be considere…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw