ROBERT DANIELS, APPELLANT,

v.

METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fayden v. Guerrero, 474 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …w trial on all issues. The new trial should have been granted only as to the issue of damages. Ford Motor Company v. Kikis, 401 So. 2d 1341 (Fla.1981); Wright & Ford Millworks, Inc. v. Long, 412 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Miller v. Dade County, 382 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). [*322] Therefore for the reasons above stated, the matter is returned to the trial court for a new trial on the issue of damages. Reversed and remanded with directions. . We approve and recommend such a procedure. Kilburn v. Da…
• Mein, Joest & Hayes, M.D., P.A. v. Weiss, 516 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
  …985). If the trial court determines that the jury has been influenced by matters outside the record, it should grant a new trial. Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So. 2d 430 (Fla.1978); Pullum v. Regency Contractors, Inc., supra; Miller v. Dade County, 382 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1980); Nazareth v. Sapp, 459 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Ridarsick v. Amirkanian, 147 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1962). In the present case, from a review of the record, we find no evidence supporting defense counsel’s “brain damage…

Authorities Cited

• Williams v. Barron Roofing Co., 206 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 1968)
• State v. Outten, 206 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 1968)
• Skelton v. State, 349 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
• Hudson v. State, 244 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
• Trivette v. State, 244 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)