SYDNEY ALWAIS, AS THE GUARDIAN OF THE MINORS MICHAEL ALWAIS AND ROBIN ALWAIS, AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF STANLEY ALWAIS, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
DR. A. DONALD MCLANE, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1980-05-28
No. 79-159
LETTS, C. J., and ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
384 So. 2d 45 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We find no error by the trial court except in its failure to itemize the costs allowed in its order taxing costs. See Sims v. Barnes, 289 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). Upon remand the trial court is directed to reconsider the motion to tax costs taking into consideration this court’s decision in County of St. Lucie v. Browning, 358 So. 2d 253 (Fla.4th DCA 1978) and to enter an order specifically setting out the items and amounts allowed.

Accordingly, this cause is affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded with directions for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

LETTS, C. J., and ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Kirkland v. Thurmond, 519 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
    …unt without itemizing such costs. Appellant contends that the trial court was required to issue an itemized order allowing or disallowing each item of cost requested, citing Sims v. Barnes, 289 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), and Alwais v. McLane, 384 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (trial court’s failure to itemize costs was reversible error). Appellant further argues that the court’s failure to do so has made it impossible to obtain proper appellate review because appellant cannot determine which items wer…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw