PAL-MAR WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, APPELLANT,
v.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Pal-Mar Water Management District challenged the South Florida Water Management District's determination that its drainage project did not qualify as a 'closed system' exempt from Chapter 373 regulatory requirements. The court affirmed the exemption denial, holding that a closed system requires current ownership or control of all relevant land, not merely the intent or statutory authority to acquire such land.
A drainage project does not qualify as a 'closed system' under Section 373.403(6) unless the project is located entirely within lands currently owned or controlled by the user. Statutory authority or intent to acquire land in the future is insufficient; the exemption requires present ownership or control. Statutory exemptions are strictly construed against the party claiming them.
[1] A "closed system" for water management purposes requires that the reservoir or works be located entirely within lands currently owned or controlled by the user.
[2] Statutory authority and intent to acquire land do not satisfy the "owned or controlled" requirement for a "closed system" exemption.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“"Closed system" means any reservoir or works located entirely within lands owned or controlled by the user and which requires water only for the filling, replenishing, and maintaining the water level thereof.”
The statutory definition of closed system that controls the court's analysis, emphasizing the requirement of current ownership or control.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePal-Mar Water Management District developed a drainage project but did not presently own or control all the land necessary to implement it. Pal-Mar cl…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Statutory Exemptions cases and more on FLexlaw
MOORE, Judge.
Pal-Mar Water Management District (Pal-Mar) seeks review of an order of the governing board of the South Florida Water Management District which declares that certain phases of Pal-Mar’s drainage project are not a closed system as defined in Section 373.403(6) Florida Statutes and, therefore, are not exempt from the rules of the District and the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes. We affirm.
The statutes in question in this appeal are Section 373.403(6), Florida Statutes (1977), which states:
“Closed system” means any reservoir or works located entirely within lands owned or controlled by the user and which requires water only for the filling, replenishing, and maintaining the water level thereof.
and Section 373.406(3), Florida Statutes, (1977), which states:
Nothing herein, or in any rule, regulation or order adopted pursuant thereto, shall be construed to be applicable to construction, operation, or maintenance of any closed system. However, part II of this chapter shall be applicable as to the taking and discharging of water for filling, replenishing, and maintaining the water level in any such closed system.
There is no question that Section 373.406(3) exempts “closed systems” from the requirements of Chapter 373, Part IV, Florida Statutes, in particular, Sections 373.413 and 373.416.
Pal-Mar contends that its drainage project meets the requirements of a closed system, even though Pal-Mar does not presently own or control all the land necessary to implement the project, because it has the statutory authority and the intent (as evidenced by its drainage plan) to acquire such land. See, e. g. Sections 298.22, 298.24, 298.28 and 298.62, Florida Statutes.
As noted above, Section 373.403(6) provides that a “ ‘Closed system’ means any reservoir or works located entirely within lands owned or controlled by the user . .” Pal-Mar simply cannot get around the fact it does not presently own or control all the land necessary to effectuate its drainage plan. Although Pal-Mar may have the statutory authority to acquire land for this purpose, this does not insure that its authority will not be challenged. Section 373.403(6) uses the wording, “owned or controlled by the user”, not “intended to be owned or controlled by the user”. Hence, in light of the strict construction against a party claiming a statutory exemption, the instant order declaring Pal-Mar’s drainage project not a closed system is affirmed. See Robinson v. Fix, 113 Fla. 151, 151 So. 512 (1933); Coe v. Broward County, 327 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976) affirmed 341 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1976).
Finding appellant’s other arguments to be without merit, we affirm.
LETTS, C. J., and LEONARD RIVKIND, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Broward Cnty. v. COE, 341 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 1976)
- Robinson v. Fix, 113 Fla. 151 (Fla. 1933)
- COE v. Broward Cnty., 327 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)