BRUCE A. MONTGOMERY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BRUCE A. MONTGOMERY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
386 So. 2d 37
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Killian v. State, 387 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).
SCHEB, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rolf's Marina, Inc. v. Rescue Serv. & Repair, Inc., 398 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…o another remedy. Perry v. Benson, 94 So. 2d 819, 821 (Fla. 1957); Restatement of Contracts § 383 (1932); criticized in Dobbs, Remedies 20 (1973). Upon remand, appellant may seek damages for the contractual breach, Tabatchnick’s II, Inc. v. Davis, 386 So. 2d 37 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); Hustad v. Edwin K. Williams & Co.-East, 321 So. 2d 601, 603 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), cert. denied, 333 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 1976); or for the alleged fraud, Storrs v. Storrs, 130 Fla. 711, 178 So. 841, 844 (1937) (rehearing), after remand,…
-
Hossam Antar v. Seamiles, LLC, 994 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)…he sought only to enforce the agreement, not to disavow [*444] it.4 Under the circumstances, Seamiles cannot avoid enforcement of the settlement agreement on the ground that the agreement is not binding on Glick. See Tabatchnick’s II, Inc. v. Davis, 386 So. 2d 37, 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (recognizing that the plaintiff, “having sued on the contract, necessarily affirmed it rather than disavowing it as required when bringing a suit for rescission”); Hustad v. Edwin K. Williams & Co.—East, 321 So. 2d 601, 603 (F…
Authorities Cited
- Forrest J. Killian, III v. State, 387 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)