THE FLORIDA BAR. RE PETITION TO AMEND FLORIDA BAR INTEGRATION RULE, ARTICLE IX, SECTION 1 (BUDGET COMMITTEE)
PER CURIAM.
The Florida Bar has proposed-an amendment to Florida Bar Integration Rule, article IX, Section 1. We grant the Bar’s petition and Florida Bar Integration Rule, article IX, Section 1 is amended to read as follows:
Article IX
FISCAL CONTROL
1. Budget Committee. The Budget Committee shall consist of nine members having staggered terms. The initial Budget Committee, appointed pursuant to this article, shall have three members appointed for three-year terms, three members appointed for two-year terms, and three members appointed for one-year terms; all appointed by the president-elect with the approval of the Board of Governors. Thereafter, the president-elect, with the approval of the Board of Governors, shall appoint three members to three-year terms and shall name a chairman-elect. The chairman-elect shall become chairman when the president-elect becomes president. The Budget Committee shall prepare a proposed annual budget for The Florida Bar to be submitted to the Board of Governors.
This amendment is effective immediately.
It is so ordered.
SUNDBERG, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Corona Props. OF Fla., Inc. v. Monroe Cnty., 485 So. 2d 1314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…for the ordinance, triggering a section 19-132 review of any pending building permits. Amendments by implication are not favored and will not be upheld in doubtful cases. State ex rel. Quigley v. Quigley, 463 So. 2d 224 (Fla.1985); State v. J.R.M., 388 So. 2d 1227 (Fla.1980); Miami Water Works Local No. 654 v. City of Miami, 157 Fla. 445, 26 So. 2d 194 (1946). Since neither section grants the Monroe County Zoning Official the authority to determine when a property owner’s rights have vested, the vested right…
-
State of Fla. ex rel. Orneta M. Quigley v. Quigley, 463 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 1985)…at the statement of legislative intent impliedly meant to repeal alimony support actions previously available under URESA. It is well established that amendment by implication is not favored and will not be upheld in doubtful cases. State v. J.R.M., 388 So. 2d 1227 (Fla.1980); Miami Water Works Local No. 654 v. City of Miami, 157 Fla. 445, 26 So. 2d 194 (1946). A better explanation for the injection of section 88.012 into Florida’s URESA is that the legislature wished to give recognition to the additional reme…
-
G. E. J. v. State, 401 So. 2d 1325 (Fla. 1981)…red these causes to this Court pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(b). These are the cases we now have before us for review. Subsequent to the instant district court decision, this Court rendered its decision in State v. J. R. M., 388 So. 2d 1227 (Fla.1980), which upheld section 39.112 from the identical constitutional attack as asserted in the instant case. We reaffirm that decision and affirm the instant trial court decisions. As to the training center question, we are in full agreement w…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence