JEWEL HALKER MCGANN, APPELLANT,
v.
GERALD E. HALKER, APPELLEE
JEWEL HALKER MCGANN, APPELLANT,
GERALD E. HALKER, APPELLEE
390 So. 2d 769
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by the ex-wife from a series of orders thwarting her attempts to enforce a money judgment obtained for alimony arrearages. It appears that the order she was attempting to enforce was misfiled by the county clerk’s office, and that subsequent orders were thus erroneously entered in other courts.
We vacate all orders entered subsequent to the June 22, 1979 final order entered by Judge Rubin, with leave to appellant to take appropriate action for enforcement of such order.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Steinbrecher, 409 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…hat if reasonable persons could disagree whether the recorded statements are clear enough to be understood, the determination of the trial court will not be disturbed. See, e.g., State v. Phillipe, 402 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Roberts v. State, 390 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) pet. for rev. dismissed, 402 So. 2d 612 (Fla.1981); State v. Battleman, 374 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Cf. United States v. Llinas, 603 F. 2d 506 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1079, 100 S.Ct. 1030, 62 L.Ed.2d 762 (19…
-
Harris v. State, 400 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)…propriate findings, which shall then be certified to this court, whether the motion and supplemental motion to suppress are dispositive of the issues in this case. DAUKSCH, C. J., and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., J., concur. . Cf. Roberts v. State, 390 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), where the court held that the suppression of the physical evidence, the out of court and the in-court identification would have left the State with no evidence, so the motion to suppress was dispositive.…
-
State v. Abel Phillipe, 402 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…ision of the Circuit Court goes beyond its proper appellate function and is an impermissible exercise in reweighing the testimony and substituting its judgment for that of the trial court. State v. Nova, 361 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 1978); Roberts v. State, 390 So. 2d 769 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); see also State v. Battleman, 374 So. 2d 636 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); State v. Riocabo, 372 So. 2d 126 (Fla.3d DCA), cert. dism., 378 So. 2d 348 (Fla.1979). The Petition for Writ of Certiorari is granted, the order under review is quash…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence