LYNDELL HART, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Borden, Inc. v. Young, 479 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …DCA 1982); Seshadri v. Morales, 412 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Wright & Ford Millworks, Inc. v. Long 412 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Erie Ins. Co. v. Bushy, 394 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Martin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 392 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). . Indeed, this attitude does not elevate us even to the level of the boxing and Roman games parallels which have often been invoked (including by this opinion) on this question. Even a boxing referee may stop a bout and rule it…
• Erie Ins. Co. & Margaret Borman v. Bushy, 394 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
  …nts. Pitts v. State, 307 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). However, whether made by defense or plaintiff’s counsel, if they are highly improper and patently prejudicial, we have no alternative. Martin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 392 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc. v. Martial, 380 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). We cannot tell in this case whether part of the damages award was “punitive,” and the product of counsel’s wrongful request for punitive damages in a case…
• Longshore v. Fronrath Chevrolet, Inc., 527 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
  …for cause where the juror initially indicated that she might not be impartial due to her ownership of stock in the defendant corporation but later stated that she could be impartial. Also, in Martin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 392 So. 2d 11, 12 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), the court, finding that the trial judge had erroneously denied a challenge for cause, stated that “[n]o matter how objective the juror might think she would be, it is unquestionable she would be less than objective about a c…

Authorities Cited

• Forrest J. Killian, III v. State, 387 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)