JAMES ANGELO ARGENTO, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Denson Emory Grate v. State, 623 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)
  …Florida Statutes (1991). Therefore, the probation officer cannot override this legislative mandate and grant his consent. See Crawford v. State, 616 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Mercer v. State, 604 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Smith v. State, 396 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Grate also challenges the court costs imposed by the trial court in the amount of $255.00 pursuant to section 27.-3455(1) and attorney’s fees of $300.00 pursuant to section 27.56(l)(a). He claims the attorney’s fees should have…
• Houston v. State, 701 So. 2d 372 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
  …erred to as the “1993 condition four”). Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.986 (1993). In 1981, this court struck the earlier condition four on the theory that it allowed a probation officer to authorize a person on probation to commit a criminal act. Smith v. State, 396 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). We stated: In addition, standard condition 4 of appellant’s probation requires that she not possess, carry or own any weapons or firearms “without first securing the consent of your Probation Officer.” This condition must be str…
• Williams v. State, 614 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)
  …ce defense counsel did not object to the instructions as given, the appellant may present this issue for review before this court only if it was fundamental error to so instruct the jury.1 Williams v. State, 285 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1973); Smith v. State, 396 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). State v. Delva, 575 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 1991), holds that it is not fundamental error to fail to instruct on an element of an offense where the record shows there was no dispute over that particular element. In Delva, the trial cou…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Frost, 374 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)