EDMUND A. VARELA (CARRIE B. WALSH, INTERVENER), APPELLANTS,
v.
J. FRANKLIN BELL, CUNO H. RUDOLPH, AND JAMES F. OYSTER, AS COMMISSIONERS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND AS MEMBERS OF THE ZONING COMMISSION, ET AL., APPELLEES
EDMUND A. VARELA (CARRIE B. WALSH, INTERVENER), APPELLANTS,
J. FRANKLIN BELL, CUNO H. RUDOLPH, AND JAMES F. OYSTER, AS COMMISSIONERS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND AS MEMBERS OF THE ZONING COMMISSION, ET AL., APPELLEES
10 F.2d 989
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Appellants, plaintiffs below, by way of intervention, filed a bill for injunction, praying the same relief as that sought by the plaintiffs in the case of Larrabee et al. v. Bell et al., 10 F.(2d) 986, — App. D. C. —, No. 4270, this day decided. For the reasons expressed in the opinion therein, the decree in this case is affirmed, with costs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Charles Carpy v. Work, 10 F.2d 991 (D.C. Cir. 1926)
-
Hines v. Welch, 23 F.2d 979 (D.C. Cir. 1928)
-
Work v. Crimora Manganese Corp., 16 F.2d 537 (D.C. Cir. 1926)
Authorities Cited
- Larrabee v. Bell, 10 F.2d 986 (D.C. Cir. 1926)