UNITED STATES EX REL. CHARLES CARPY, W. A. T. AGARD, F. H. STEWART ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
HUBERT WORK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, APPELLEE
UNITED STATES EX REL. CHARLES CARPY, W. A. T. AGARD, F. H. STEWART ET AL., APPELLANTS,
HUBERT WORK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, APPELLEE
10 F.2d 991
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion of the Court
This is a companion case to No. 4366, United States ex rel. Jarman v. Work, Secretary of the Interior, 10 F.(2d) 989, — App. D. C. —, this day decided. It is unnecessary to review the facts, since it comes clearly within the rulings of the Supreme Court in the cases of Work v. Rives, 45 S. Ct. 252, 267 U. S. 175, 69 L. Ed. 561, and Work v. Chestatee, 45 S. Ct. 256, 267 U. S. 185, 69 L. Ed. 566. There is nothing in the record which discloses arbitrary or capricious conduct on the part of the Secretary in disposing of the plaintiff’s claim.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fairclaw v. Forrest, 130 F.2d 829 (D.C. Cir. 1942)
-
Thompson v. Sylvan Mazo, 421 F.2d 1156 (D.C. Cir. 1970)
-
Bradbury v. Howard, 31 F.2d 222 (D.C. Cir. 1929)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Work v. United States Ex rel. Rives, 267 U.S. 175 (U.S. 1925)
- Work v. United States Ex rel. Chestatee Pyrites & Chem. Corp., 267 U.S. 185 (U.S. 1925)
- Edmund A. Varela (Carrie B. Walsh v. Bell, 10 F.2d 989 (D.C. Cir. 1926)