DONALD ALLAN JACKSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DONALD ALLAN JACKSON, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
400 So. 2d 173
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the conviction based on circumstantial evidence, see, e. g., Anderson v. State, 354 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert. denied, 359 So. 2d 1210 (Fla.1978); Miller v. State, 270 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972), cert. denied, 275 So. 2d 16 (Fla.1973); Wright v. State, 269 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972), cert. denied 274 So. 2d 235 (Fla.1973), and uphold the jury finding that the evidence is inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See, e. g., McArthur v. State, 351 So. 2d 972 (Fla.1977); Diaz v. State, 387 So. 2d 978 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Nadean O. McARTHUR v. State, 351 So. 2d 972 (Fla. 1977)
- Rigoberto Diaz v. State, 387 So. 2d 978 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Miller v. State, 270 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- Wright v. State, 269 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)
- Carol S. Jack (Beloff) and Barry Beloff v. Northside Motors, Inc., 275 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 1973)
- Anderson v. State, 354 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
- Stokes v. Crews, 274 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 1973)
- Wright v. State, 274 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 1973)