WILLIAM R. MULDROW, APPELLANT,
v.
G. DAVISS STARR AND BARBARA G. STARR, HIS WIFE, ET AL., APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Leave To Amend cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Muldrow appeals an order dismissing his complaint with prejudice as to all defendants except G. Daviss Starr and his wife Bargara G., and as to them, dismissing the complaint without prejudice and with leave to amend. After due consideration of the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the order of the trial court in all respects except as to the dismissal with prejudice of Count X and defendant Samuel Givens. The allegations against the other defendants dismissed with prejudice are frivolous and vexatious, almost totally defying reasonable comprehension, and involve statements made in court proceedings and matters resolved in prior litigation. However, as to Count X, involving defendant Samuel Givens, appellant’s allegations may involve matters that have not been litigated before and may arguably have merit if properly pleaded.
Accordingly, the order is affirmed in part and reversed in part and the trial court is directed to enter an amended order dismissing Count X without prejudice and with leave to amend.
MILLS, ERVIN and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (16 total)
-
Amado L. Pedroso v. State, 420 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)…o. 2d 673, 675 (Fla.1980). Appellant could have raised the retention of jurisdiction issue on direct appeal. Thus, the issue is not now cognizable for collateral attack. We respectfully disagree with our sister court’s decision in Sawyer v. State, 401 So. 2d 939 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), dismissing a direct appeal alleging improper retention of jurisdiction without prejudice to raise the issue on a Rule 3.850 motion. Accordingly, the trial judge’s denial of the Rule 3.850 motion is AFFIRMED. BOARDMAN and DAN…
-
Samuel S.J. Alexander v. State, 425 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)…ndividual particularity requirement of section 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981). A court’s failure to satisfy this individual particularity requirement is a procedural error. Canty v. State, 402 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Sawyer v. State, 401 So. 2d 939 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Appellant did not object when this error occurred. Hence, he cannot raise this issue on appeal. Canty; cf. Williams v. State, 414 So. 2d 509 (Fla.1982). In reviewing the sentencing order we could not help but observe that porti…
-
Studstill v. State, 417 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Sawyer v. State, 401 So. 2d 939 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); cf. Williams v. State, 414 So. 2d 509 (Fla.1982) (timely objection to retention of jurisdiction over sentence). DOWNEY, HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence