TONY RUSSELL STUDSTILL, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Elkins v. Bosch, 433 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …1 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Wilson v. Condra, 255 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). Additionally, a party must show that the welfare of the child will be promoted by the change. Brush v. Brush, 414 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Haines v. Haines, 417 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Culpepper v. Culpepper, 408 So. 2d 782; Brown v. Brown, 388 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Stricklin v. Stricklin, 383 So. 2d 1183; Nicholson v. Nicholson, 311 So. 2d 676. The report of the general master, adopted by the trial…
• Melrose Nursery, Inc. v. Hunt, 443 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …al months prior to the trial and would, therefore, not have been prejudiced by his testimony. See Binger v. King Pest Control, 401 So. 2d 1310 (Fla.1981); First Republic Corp. of America v. Hayes, 431 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Haines v. Haines, 417 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). We note, without the necessity of having to decide the issue, that although the plaintiff’s introduction into evidence of the $300,000 liability policy limit might have been harmless error in light of the jury verdict of $40,0…
• Doyle R. Alderman v. Alderman, 484 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
  …e the time of the original judgment and that the best welfare of the child will be promoted by such change in custody. Sanders v. Sanders, 376 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Zediker v. Zediker, 444 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Haines v. Haines, 417 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). This would be the extent of the former wife’s burden in the instant ease if she were seeking a change of custody to herself, a burden which has been characterized as an “extraordinary” one. Zediker, supra, at 1036; McGregor v. M…

Authorities Cited

• Williams v. State, 414 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 1982)
• Muldrow v. Starr, 401 So. 2d 939 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)