JORGE L. DOMINGUEZ, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1981-09-30
No. 80-2157
SCHEB, C. J., and GRIMES and RYDER, JJ., concur.
405 So. 2d 736 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1981)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that retaining jurisdiction for sentence review under an amended statute, when the offense occurred before the amendment's effective date, constitutes an ex post facto application of the law.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was convicted of offenses committed before a statutory amendment allowed trial courts to retain jurisdiction for sentence review. The amendm…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Jorge Dominguez appeals his conviction and sentence on March 21, 1980, for two counts of second-degree murder. We affirm the conviction but remand for correction of the sentence. 367 So. 2d 651 (Fla. App.).

After reviewing each point raised by appellant, we find only one point which has merit. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in retaining jurisdiction for the first third of his sentence pursuant to section 947.16, Florida Statutes (Supp.1978).

Appellant was charged with an offense committed December 5, 1977. The effective date of the amendment to section 947.-16 allowing the trial court to retain jurisdiction to review a parole commission release order during the first third of an offender’s sentence was June 19, 1978.

Appellant’s contention is correct. The amendment to section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1978), is an ex post facto law as applied to him. Thus, we remand this cause and direct the trial court to delete from the appellant’s sentence the trial court’s reservation of jurisdiction. State v. Williams, 397 So. 2d 663 (Fla.1981); Rodriguez v. State, 380 So. 2d 1123 (Fla.2d DCA 1980).

SCHEB, C. J., and GRIMES and RYDER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw