DONALD DALE BIJOLLE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1981-11-10
No. 79-2225
Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and NESBITT, JJ.
405 So. 2d 1037 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Simmons v. State, 287 So. 2d 720 (Fla.3d DCA 1974), cert. discharged, 305 So. 2d 178 (Fla.1974); Bernhardt v. State, 288 So. 2d 490 (Fla.1974); Randolph v. State, 292 So. 2d 374 (Fla.3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 300 So. 2d 901 (Fla.1974).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Livingston Milbry v. State, 469 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
    …court is committed to the principle that the Youthful Offender Act [ch. 958, Fla.Stat. (1983) ] may not be invoked to impose a sentence which exceeds the statutory maximum set for the offense for which an accused stands convicted. Saunders v. State, 405 So. 2d 1037 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); contra Dunlap v. State, 433 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). The Act was obviously designed to impose more lenient sanctions on a youthful offender who meets the statutory requirements, not to aggravate the sanctions which would o…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw