EDWARD BAILEY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1981-12-22
No. 81-468
Before SCHWARTZ, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
407 So. 2d 388 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Husted v. State, 370 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jackson v. State, 412 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
    …42 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (no fundamental error when intent not in question); McMurtroy v. State, 400 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (same, following Williams); Gibson v. State, 403 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (same, following Williams); Lee v. State, 407 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (per curiam) (same, following Williams). State v. Carter, 4 Wash.App. 103, 480 P. 2d 794 (1971) is squarely on point. In citing and approving that decision in Williams at 400 So. 2d 546, we described it as a case in which four co…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw