STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
ROD WAYNE LEVASSEUR, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a jacket found in a residence subject to a search warrant was an article within the scope of the warrant and thus seizable.
During a lawful search of a residence, an officer observed a bulge in a jacket belonging to appellee. The officer seized the jacket and found what app…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Seizure Of Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The State appeals an order of the Circuit Court of Alachua County which granted appellee’s motion to suppress certain evidence. We reverse.
Officer Jempson assisted other officers in the execution of a search warrant of a residence. Appellee was one of the people in the house when the officers entered it. The officers determined that appellee and others did not reside at the residence and were going to allow them to leave. At that point, appellee asked to go into the back bedroom to get his shoes, and Jempson accompanied him. Appellee put on his shoes and then grabbed a blue windbreaker jacket off the bed. As he did so, Jempson noticed that there was a bulge in the jacket and it swayed as if weighted down. Jemp-son took the jacket from appellee, fearing that there was a weapon in it, and felt it for a weapon. He felt no weapon but felt tablets that appeared to be some kind of drug tablets and asked appellee to remove the package from the jacket. When appel-lee did so, Jempson saw tablets, which, based on his experience, appeared to be quaaludes. Appellant contends the search was pursuant to a valid search warrant. Appellee raises no question as to the validity of the warrant but contends Jempson had no authority to search the jacket. We disagree.
The search warrant directs the search of the residence and curtilage thereof for methaqualone. The jacket, which was lying on the bed before appellant picked it up, was an article in the residence which was subject to search pursuant to the warrant. The quaaludes (methaqualone) were validly seized pursuant to the warrant.
REVERSED.
McCORD, ERVIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Richards, 487 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)…lant contends that the trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress because the search of appellee’s purse and wallet came within the scope of the warrant. We agree and reverse the order of suppression on the authority of State v. Levasseur, 411 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). In Levasseur, police officers executed a search warrant for a residence. Levass-eur, a visitor in the house, asked for and was granted permission to leave. As he lifted his jacket off a bed, one of the officers noticed a bulge…
-
State v. Hendrix, 855 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…al findings to determine whether they are supported by competent, substantial evidence; review of the trial court’s application of the law to the facts is de novo. Williams v. State, 721 So. 2d 1192, 1193 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). In State v. Levasseur, 411 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), the defendant was a visitor to a house that was the subject of a search warrant for quaaludes. He asked permission to leave. The defendant picked up his windbreaker jacket off the bed, and the officer noticed a bulge in its pock…