STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
DEBBIE JOY RICHARDS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The State appeals from a suppression order after police searched a visitor's purse during execution of a residential search warrant for drugs. The court reverses, holding that the purse, as an article within the residence capable of containing the items sought, fell within the scope of the warrant.
The search of the purse came within the scope of the warrant. The purse, as an article within the residence capable of containing the items sought by the warrant, was properly searchable even though it belonged to a visitor and was not in her immediate possession.
[1] A search warrant for a residence authorizes the search of articles within the residence capable of containing the items sought and described in the warrant.
[2] A search warrant for a residence authorizes the search of a visitor's personal belongings found within the residence if those belongings are capable of containing the ite…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The jacket, which was lying on the bed before appellant picked it up, was an article in the residence which was subject to search pursuant to the warrant.”
Establishes the principle that items within a residence are searchable under a warrant if they could contain the sought items, regardless of ownership.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOakland Park police executed a search warrant to search a residence for cocaine, narcotics, and drug paraphernalia. After searching the second floor a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Protective Search cases and more on FLexlaw
DELL, Judge.
The State of Florida appeals from an order granting appellee’s motion to suppress. The Oakland Park police executed a search warrant directing them to search a residence for cocaine, other narcotics and drug paraphernalia. After searching the second floor, which yielded cocaine and drug paraphernalia, the police observed a purse on a table. It belonged to appellee, a visitor on the premises. They searched the purse. Inside they found a wallet which contained appellee’s driver’s license and in the change compartment a gram of cocaine. The police arrested appellee and charged her with possession of cocaine. The trial court granted her motion to suppress which alleged that the search of her purse and wallet exceeded the scope of the warrant.
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress because the search of appellee’s purse and wallet came within the scope of the warrant. We agree and reverse the order of suppression on the authority of State v. Levasseur, 411 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
In Levasseur, police officers executed a search warrant for a residence. Levass-eur, a visitor in the house, asked for and was granted permission to leave. As he lifted his jacket off a bed, one of the officers noticed a bulge in the jacket pocket. Thinking it might contain a weapon, the officer took the jacket and felt it. The bulge proved to be quaalude tablets. The trial court suppressed the quaaludes on the basis that the search warrant did not au thorize the police to search the jacket. The First District reversed and held:
The search warrant directs the search of the residence and curtilage thereof for methaqualone. The jacket, which was lying on the bed before appellant picked it up, was an article in the residence which was subject to search pursuant to the warrant. The quaaludes (methaqual-one) were validly seized pursuant to the warrant.
Id. at 296.
Appellee argues that Levasseur can be distinguished from the present case because the police searched the jacket thinking that it might contain a deadly weapon. We find no merit in this distinction because the validity of the search was upheld on the basis of the search warrant, not because it constituted a protective search.
Appellee did not have the purse in her immediate possession. Rather, like the jacket in Levasseur, it was an article in the residence capable of containing the items sought and described in the warrant. Therefore we hold the search of appellee’s purse came within the scope of the warrant to search the premises. See United States v. Johnson, 475 F. 2d 977 (D.D.C.1973).
Accordingly, we reverse the order granting the motion to suppress and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
HERSEY, C.J., and WALDEN, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Hendrix, 855 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…cer recognized the tablets as quaaludes. This Court held that the jacket was an article in the residence subject to a search warrant for quaaludes, therefore, the tablets were validly seized pursuant to the warrant. Similarly, in State v. Richards, 487 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), the State appealed an order granting a motion to suppress. The officers began searching the second floor and found a purse on a table, which belonged to a visitor on the premises. The officers searched the purse and found cocain…
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Johnson, 475 F.2d 977 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
- Moyer v. AETNA Life Ins. Co. & Brandon Eugene Paul Moyer, 411 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- State v. Rod Wayne Levasseur, 411 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)